A Dashboard of Decision Theories
Decision Theories Dashboard
Evaluation Criteria Overview
1. Psychological Plausibility
How well the theory reflects actual human mind functioning in decision processes?
- 1 - Based on perfectly rational agents or idealized mechanisms without cognitive basis
- 2 - Accounts for some cognitive limits but lacks emotions, context or real dynamics
- 3 - Recognizes cognitive constraints and emotions but in non-systematic way
- 4 - Structurally integrates cognitive and affective constraints
- 5 - Supported by neuroscientific evidence and experimental data
2. Explanatory Power
Theory's ability to explain real phenomena and decision paradoxes
- 1 - Explains only standard rational decisions
- 2 - Recognizes anomalies but doesn't integrate them
- 3 - Explains known biases with ad-hoc tools
- 4 - Provides unified explanations for multiple biases
- 5 - Predictively explains previously unknown anomalies
3. Predictive Accuracy
Model's ability to predict decisions in real/simulated environments
- 1 - Unreliable even in ideal conditions
- 2 - Works only in artificial scenarios
- 3 - Moderate accuracy in structured environments
- 4 - Successfully predicts real choices in multiple domains
- 5 - Generalizes to new scenarios, outperforms alternatives
4. Operational Applicability
Practical usability in real-world domains (policy, tech, finance)
- 1 - Purely theoretical/academic
- 2 - Applicable only through arbitrary interpretations
- 3 - Implemented in computational models
- 4 - Basis for operational tools in at least one domain
- 5 - Widely used across multiple sectors
5. Socio-Cultural Validity
Support for inclusive, culturally contextualized decisions
- 1 - Ignores ethical/cultural dimensions
- 2 - Recognizes social aspects but doesn't integrate
- 3 - Partially accounts for cultural variables
- 4 - Allows social context modeling
- 5 - Actively improves decision fairness and sustainability
6. Formal Robustness
Logical coherence and mathematical tractability
- 1 - Informal/vague structure
- 2 - Logically coherent but not formalizable
- 3 - Formalizable with exceptions
- 4 - Mathematically rigorous
- 5 - Elegant and computationally compatible